Opposition Group Claims New Info Showing Iran Still Working Toward Nukes
Earlier, IAEA said Tehran stalling its work by failing to cooperate, meaning full deal by November 24 deadline unlikely
By George Jahn and Deb Reichmann, The Associated Press
November 7, 2014
VIENNA (AP) — An Iranian opposition group claimed Friday to have new information showing Iran is still working toward nuclear weapons.
It made the claim hours after the UN’s nuclear agency said that its attempts to probe allegations that Tehran worked on nuclear weapons were deadlocked — a finding that all but rules out hopes of full nuclear deal between six world powers and Iran by the November 24 target date.
Iran agreed in February to work with the International Atomic Energy Agency, in what was seen as a test of Tehran’s professed new willingness to reduce tensions over its nuclear program.
Since then, the agency has sought information on alleged experiments with detonators that can be used to set off nuclear explosions; work on high-explosive charges used in nuclear blasts, and alleged studies on calculating nuclear explosive yields.
Iran denies wanting — or ever working on — nuclear arms. Since February, it has provided information only on the detonators, insisting that they were used for oil exploration or non-nuclear military purposes. The agency says interconnected information suggests that they were being tested for nuclear weapons use.
“Iran has not provided any explanations that enable the agency to clarify the outstanding practical measures,” said the confidential report from the IAEA obtained by The Associated Press.
The finding is significant in recording where the investigation stands for the U.S. and five other world powers negotiating with Iran.
As part of its probe, the IAEA has for years sought access to Parchin, a sprawling military establishment southeast of Tehran. It says it has indications that Iran built a special chamber there to conduct testing of high explosives linked to setting off a nuclear explosion — and has progressively cleaned up the site.
The National Council of Resistance, an Iranian opposition group, claimed Friday to have new information linked to such testing. The Council told reporters in Washington that a second chamber was also built, with its present location unknown and that both structures were constructed by a company affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards.
The IAEA suspects Vycheslav Danilenko — a Ukrainian who worked in a Soviet-era research institute that was identified mainly with nuclear weapons — played a major role in building the Parchin chamber — something Danilenko has denied. The IAEA has not formally connected other foreigners with the project, but the opposition officials in Washington said Danilenko was helped by his son-in-law, Vladimir Padalko.
The council has a mixed record of credibility on Iran’s nuclear activities. It was instrumental in revealing more than a decade ago that Tehran had a secret program but some of its other allegations remain unproven.
It says its latest information came from inside Iran’s atomic energy agency, the defense ministry, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other Iranian organizations linked to the country’s nuclear program.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki had no comment on the council’s information.
The U.S. and its allies say no final agreement will be reached until the IAEA says it’s satisfied with its inquiry. With the IAEA investigation stalled, the agency has little hope of reaching final conclusions by Nov. 24.
Diplomats have told The Associated Press that — if agreement is reached constraining Iran’s uranium enrichment program and other activities that could be turned to making nuclear arms — Washington was willing to extend the IAEA investigation.
But they say the U.S. would set a time limit on any such extension and keep some sanctions on Tehran in place until the IAEA delivers its ruling. That would satisfy neither hardliners in Iran who want a full lifting of sanctions nor U.S. congressional critics, particularly after this week’s Republican sweep of Congress.
Report: Iran Nuclear Program More Advanced than Previously Believed
Claims of second explosive chamber raise new questions as talks reach deadline
By Adam Kredo, The Washington Free Beacon
Iran’s illicit nuclear program could be more advanced than previously believed, according to new information released Friday by an Iranian dissident group that raises new questions about what Tehran has been hiding from nuclear inspectors.
Iran is said to have built and still be in possession of two explosive chambers that have allowed the regime to conduct advanced testing of nuclear weapons, according to new information published by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), an Iranian opposition group that has exposed Iran’s clandestine nuclear activities in the past.
While the existence of one explosive chamber has been known for some time, the NCRI claims a second device could be hidden at Iran’s Parchin military complex, or at another site somewhere in Iran.
The claims raise new questions about the status and extent of Iran’s nuclear progress as negotiations between Tehran and the West approach their Nov. 24 deadline.
New information about the purported explosive chambers—as well as Iran’s elaborate network of front companies and organizations meant to obfuscate this nuclear work—was released on the same day that the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog accused Iran of failing to address key questions about it’s nuclear program.
“Today’s information uncovers a simple truth: The clerical regime is ceaselessly and secretly forging ahead with the military dimensions of its nuclear program and has no intention whatsoever of abandoning that program,” Soona Samsami, the NCRI’s U.S. representative, told reporters at a press briefing.
The two explosive chambers are said to have been built in the early 2000s by Iran’s AzarAb Industries, which is affiliated with Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), according to the NCRI, which said it obtained this information from Iranian regime sources between 2012 and October 2014.
Construction of these chambers, which could have helped Iran make key advances on the nuclear front, was undertaken as part “of a highly classified special project” known to only the highest-level Iranian officials, according to the NCRI.
“The chambers were to be used for special tests, particularly for high explosive impact as part of the nuclear weapons program of Iran,” the NCRI claimed.
The organization says that it has shared this new information with the U.S. government as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
One of the two chambers is said to have been installed at the Parchin complex, the site of a recent explosion that killed two. It is unclear where the second purported chamber currently resides, the NCRI said.
“This is the question that the IAEA” should immediately take up and pursue, said NCRI’s Alireza Jafarzadeh, who conducted a presentation for reporters about the new information.
“We don’t know where the other chamber is,” Jafarzadeh said. “It could be at another site where they’re doing similar activities. It could even be in Parchin and we’re not aware of it. We know for sure that there were two such chambers built.”
“There’s no benign use behind the second chamber,” he said. “The question is where is it and what are they doing with it now?”
“The concern anyone would have and the IAEA should have is, ‘What happened to that second chamber?’” he said. “This is something the IAEA should immediately ask Iran to clarify.”
In addition to the claims of a second explosive chamber, the NCRI published the names of several organizations and individuals that it says are responsible for obfuscating Iran’s ongoing nuclear work through an elaborate network of front companies.
The top Iranian official in charge of “the design and installation of the explosive chamber” is an IRGC official named Saeed Borji, according to the NCRI.
“The explosive chamber(s) installed and used at Parchin Miliary Complex were part of a project that began under the supervision of the nuclear weapons division of Iran,” the NCRI claimed in materials provided to reporters.
“Mohsen Fakhrizadeh Mahabadi, the key figure for the Iranian regime’s nuclear weapons program, headed the project,” according to the NCRI.
Iran covered its tracks by establishing front companies and research organizations that claimed to be doing work in the field of nanodiamonds, or small diamonds that can be created through a detonation.
Foreign experts from Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine were employed in the past by Iran to help with this work, the NCRI claimed.
If Tehran had actually ceased its nuclear work in the early 2000s, as the regime has claimed, then it would not currently be baring United Nations inspectors from its military sites, the NCRI said.
“These are questions, outstanding questions that get to the core of the nuclear program of Iran,” Jafarzadeh said. “The entirely nuke structure of the Iranian regime remains intact.”
When asked about the new information in a State Department briefing, spokesperson Jen Psaki said, “We’re aware of the claims that were made, but we don’t have any comments on the substance.”
Officials on the White House National Security Council did not respond to Washington Free Beacon requests for comment about the information.
Meanwhile, the IAEA revealed in a confidential report that Iran still will not answer questions about possible explosive tests it has conducted.
“Iran has not provided any explanations that enable the agency to clarify the outstanding practical measures,” the IAEA report said, according to Reuters.